On being a "renaissance man"

I was reading a blog article that was focusing on the idea of the modern "renaissance man" [OK, renaissance person] and how one would attempt to become one. I was struck by the fact that our modern era is one of specialization and it is rare find someone who is broadly competent in a variety of areas. It is so rare, in fact, that it seems downright odd and our culture and society does not reward or value that kind of broad knowledge. We tend to become employed in a narrow area of responsibility or technical expertise and society views any concerted effort to gain a broader knowledge as wasted effort. The education system seems to be narrowing the student's focus and exposure rather than broadening their education. A university education is priced out of reach for anything that doesn't have a career payback.
Sometimes we will hear about a baseball player or someone else in sports who also has an interest in something other than their sport. It is mentioned as an oddity -- and as "color commentary" that player 'A' is a gifted artist or a musician or writes poetry or makes furniture.

One short line from the blog article stuck in my mind and I paraphrase it here: Nothing exposes a person's ignorance and lack of culture quicker than faulty geography or a lack of literary knowledge. I would add to that a lack of basic historical awareness. I don't think that you need to be a walking encyclopedia but you should know that Pakistan is in Asia and Ecuador is in South America. It would help to know that India and Pakistan are neighbors and that people in Ecuador speak Spanish.

Americans are notably ill informed on geography, literature and history. The situation is so bad that you cringe when people call into talk radio or C-SPAN to ask a question or make a comment. The ones who are least informed seem to be the ones with ready access to telephones and the airwaves.

Sarah Palin, Michele Bachman, and Texas Governor Rick Perry have managed to rise to the top of political life with little basic knowledge or apparent understanding of history, geography or literature...not to mention the constitution or economics.  Presumably, the people who support them are either equally ill informed or choose to ignore the obvious deficit in the candidstes' knowledge. Some of it is pretty comical but the Founding Fathers would be appalled at the lack of basic knowledge in both the voters and the candidates.

It's getting late so I'll end this for now -- to be revisited later.